From coronavirus to credit market stress
It’s been a rocky time for financial markets, as investors react to policymakers’ response to limit the economic impact of the coronavirus outbreak. While much of the media’s coverage has focused on the number of infections and the market reaction, Manulife Investment Management's Global Chief Economist Frances Donald believes it’s just as important for investors to keep an eye on one area: fixed income.
It’s clear to us that the global economy is experiencing the beginnings of one of the sharpest contractions in modern economic history. As unsettling as that thought is, it’s crucial that we shift some of our attention from the cause of the contraction and start focusing on a troubling side effect: the dysfunction in the global fixed-income market.
In our view, it’s critical that central banks worldwide are able to act to prevent this market from experiencing further stress, or the upcoming economic downturn will be prolonged and worsened. From an investment perspective, this could also mean that the risk-off mentality will likely persist for a much longer period of time.
There’s no doubt that the rate at which the COVID-19 infection grows—or falls—is important, but so are fiscal measures—they’ll influence the depth of the recession and the timing and shape of the recovery. But the pressing macroeconomic question at hand, in our view, has less to do with the viral outbreak and more to do with restoring calm to the credit markets.
On this front, there’s some positive news. In addition to the U.S. Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) giant stimulus package unveiled on March 151 and its follow-up announcement regarding the Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF) two days later,2 in the past few days, the Fed has also:
- Implemented the MMLF.3 In an effort to unfreeze the commercial paper market, the Fed’s Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (MMLF) provides nonrecourse funding (i.e., funding secured by collateral) for banks and broker-dealers to buy commercial papers that money market funds are trying to sell. The Fed allowed banks to exclude these transactions from the way bank capital is usually calculated so that banks using this facility don’t end up using precious balance sheet space (in the form of reduced capital buffer). This is an important distinction between the MMLF and the CPFF.
- Expanded its U.S. dollar (USD) swap lines. The facility has been expanded to include additional central banks.4 Crucially, the Fed announced on March 20 that the swap lines would run on a daily, not weekly, basis.
- Continued QE at a blazing pace. The Fed will buy US$275 billion of Treasuries this week alone,5 and we think it’s very likely that it will have to further expand its quantitative easing (QE) program, initially described as “at least US$500 billion,”1 fairly soon.
In Europe, the European Central Bank also unveiled a massive stimulus package on March 18, announcing that it will take much more periphery debt, private sector commercial paper, and corporate debt onto its balance sheet.6
Let’s be clear—these are very important policy actions that have managed to help the U.S. Treasury markets to a degree. However, we believe there are sizable and pressing problems at play and, until these issues are addressed, it makes sense to remain cautious.
Problems that still need addressing
- Real yields are rising (defined as nominal yields minus inflation), as market-based measures of inflation continue to plummet. Dramatically lower oil prices aren’t helping. As a senior colleague observed, real yields are typically the single most important measure of whether the market believes the Fed will be successful at bolstering inflation. In our view, the Fed is likely to be monitoring real yields very closely.
- Swap lines could be more inclusive. While the Fed’s expanded swap lines will no doubt ease concerns about a potential shortage in the USD, the arrangement excludes India and China, which could limit the effectiveness of the program. As a result, we’re likely to see continued upward pressure on the USD, although to a lesser extent.
- Mortgage rates are rising. This is likely to put a cap on the surge in refinancing applications that we saw earlier this month. This counterintuitive development speaks to the weak transmission mechanism between the Fed’s rate cuts and the real economy, and the inefficiencies of cutting rates when banks are worried about extending loans to consumers whose financial circumstances could change soon.
- There are still sizable discounts between the prices of ETFs and their underlying net asset values. This is particularly true for fixed-income exchange-traded funds (ETFs), suggesting there could be stress within that market.
- Municipal bonds are also displaying signs of stress. As another colleague noted, many U.S. municipalities typically rely on sales tax, income tax, and corporate tax revenues to operate. As economic activities stall, it’s likely many of them will see reduced revenues, which would have implications for this market segment.
Most importantly, we believe the most important thing that the Fed can do at this juncture would to purchase corporate bonds (possibly via ETFs). We view the other mechanisms are band-aid solutions that may hold the market together, but the “cure” may be to find a large buyer for these assets, and that would be the U.S. central bank. Our conviction on this outcome has grown in the last few days and we see corporate bond buying as the end game. As we’ve said previously, the Fed will first have to get Congress to amend the Federal Reserve Act, but it’s been done before and can be done again, particularly since former Fed Chairs Janet Yellen and Ben Bernanke both noting that it needs to be done.7
It’s an indisputable fact: Central banks have been hard at work this week, digging deep into their respective toolboxes to limit the extent of the economic damage. In our opinion, while we’re grateful that they’ve done as much within such a short period of time, there can be no doubt that more impactful policy actions will be needed.
1 “FOMC Press Conference Call,” federalreserve.gov, March 15, 2020. 2 “Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF),” federalreserve.gov, March 18, 2020. 3 “Federal bank regulatory agencies issue interim final rule for Money Market Liquidity Facility,” federalreserve.gov, March 19, 2020. 4 “Coordinated central bank action to further enhance the provision of U.S. dollar liquidity,” federalreserve.gov, March 20, 2020. 5 Bloomberg, March 16, 2020. 6 “ECB announces €750 billion Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme (PEPP),” European Central Bank, March 18, 2020. 7 “Bernanke and Yellen: the Federal Reserve must reduce long-term damage from coronavirus,” Financial Times, March 18, 2020.
The opinions expressed are those of the speaker at the time of recording and are subject to change as market and other conditions warrant. No forecasts are guaranteed and past performance is no guarantee of future results. The subadvisors’ affiliates, employees and clients may hold or trade the securities mentioned, if any, in this commentary. The information is based on sources believed to be reliable, but does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of John Hancock Investment Management.
This material is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be, nor shall it be interpreted or construed as, a recommendation or providing advice, impartial or otherwise. John Hancock Investment Management and its representatives and affiliates may receive compensation derived from the sale of and/or from any investment made in its products and services.
Quantitative easing (QE) is a monetary policy in which a central bank purchases government debt or other fixed-income securities in an effort to lower interest rates, increase the money supply, and stimulate economic growth.
A swap line is an agreement between two central banks to exchange currencies. It allows a central bank to obtain foreign currency liquidity from the central bank that issues it.