Climate change: don’t avoid the problem, be part of the solution
Well-intentioned, climate-oriented investors are using a variety of approaches to align their capital with the future they want to see. One approach is to move capital away from today’s high emissions sectors—but ironically, it’s these same sectors that hold the key to a low-carbon future. In this article, we explore why a strategic and proactive approach might be more effective in both combating climate change and capturing value from industries leading the low-carbon transition.
We explain the four investment pillars—low-carbon energy, transition materials, electrification and efficiency, and resource security—that together can result in the biggest positive climate impact.
Sanctions imposed on Russia’s oil and gas exports in 2022 created historic energy shortages in Europe, putting the region’s energy security and affordability into a critical state. Fortunately, warmer-than-average winter temperatures helped build back natural gas inventories, bring prices down from record highs, and reduce the risk of a full-blown energy crisis.
Although the situation in Europe seems to have stabilized for now, this situation highlights once again our world’s dependence on fossil fuels: We’re not yet able to significantly reduce or even completely eliminate fossil fuels in the short term, and attempts to do so without clear alternatives can lead to disorderly markets. It’s important to note that Europe is an early adopter and strong advocate of sustainable energy—with about 40% of its electricity production coming from renewable energy sources—and yet was heavily affected by oil and gas supply disruptions. The reality is that transitioning to a sustainable future is complex, and fossil fuels, along with some other carbon-intensive industries such as mining, will have a role to play in it.
The Russia-Ukraine conflict has created great volatility in energy markets
Natural gas prices in the European Union (USD per million metric British thermal unit)
Generally, climate-oriented investors avoid heavy polluters altogether through negative screening. While we understand the idea of not supporting companies that are damaging the environment, we believe that investors who focus only on low-emissions companies aren’t leveraging the opportunities that the low-carbon transition offers. Over US$7 trillion annually is expected to be spent to help the world decarbonize, and investors will be well served to invest in the companies providing those solutions and that are therefore on the front lines of climate change mitigation. As such, for investors to help combat climate change in the most effective way, we believe there are four key investment themes to consider:
- Low-carbon energy
- Transition materials
- Electrification and efficiency
- Resource security
As a society, we embarked on a massive energy shift toward renewable energy a long time ago, with hydroelectric and nuclear sources first increasing in prominence in the middle of the 20th century. Despite this, fossil fuels still represent more than 80% of the global energy supply. Ramping up renewables can’t happen overnight, but if the transition began so long ago, why do we have so little progress to show?
The reality is that fossil fuels are rooted in our consumption habits as a widely available, cost-effective energy source. To replace fossil fuels, we therefore need a technology that is better not only from an environmental standpoint but also from a cost perspective, while being broadly available. We believe that we’ve finally reached this point with solar and wind.
Thanks to new technologies, the global weighted average levelized cost of electricity (LCOE, or the total cost of building and operating a power plant over its lifetime divided by its energy production) for wind and solar has decreased significantly since 2010. Specifically, the LCOE from photovoltaic solar projects decreased by 85%, concentrated solar power by 68%, onshore wind by 56%, and offshore wind by 48%. In fact, it’s now even cheaper to produce electricity with wind and solar than with fossil fuels over the long term, with the main caveat being that the power from wind and solar is intermittent.
Renewables-based electricity is now a cheaper option than fossil fuels
Global weighted average levelized cost of electricity (USD/kWh)
With solar and wind energy production having become less expensive, we’re seeing a steep acceleration of the ongoing energy transition. Wind and solar power generation grew 14% and 23% in 2021, respectively, while fossil fuel power generation increased 6%. Massive investments, however, will be needed to keep fueling that exponential growth, and private investors will have a crucial role to play in closing this funding gap.
Wind power generation needs to grow even faster to reach net zero
Wind power generation (TWh)
Case study: an industry leader with superior environmental practices
Although low-carbon energy companies are, as a whole, beneficial for the planet, fundamental analysis and security selection are still critical within that sector to invest in companies that are superior from both an environmental and commercial standpoint.
For example, a company we particularly like in the wind power industry has not only dominant market share and a strong balance sheet but also stands out from an environmental standpoint—its carbon intensity is 7% lower than the industry average.1 The company also pledged to become carbon neutral by 2030 and invested more than 20% of its gross profit in R&D in 2021 to continue to increase its turbines’ productivity and efficiency.2 These actions indicate to us that this company isn’t only well positioned commercially but also committed to have a significant environmental impact today and tomorrow.
To fuel the ongoing green transition and reach net zero by 2050, the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that global investments in clean energy will need to triple by 2030 to around US$4 trillion. But there’s also no transition without the world mining more minerals.
Renewable power plants are usually in remote areas—offshore wind farms, for example, that can be miles away from shore—and bringing this power to populated centers will therefore require new and more copper transmission cables. Moreover, electric vehicles (EVs) require up to six times more minerals than conventional gasoline and diesel cars. In fact, according to the IEA, the market size of critical transition materials such as copper, cobalt, lithium, and nickel needs to grow almost sevenfold by 2030 to have a fighting chance of reaching net zero by 2050.
Clean energy technologies rely more heavily on minerals
Minerals used in cars and selected power generation sources
It’s no secret that extracting minerals produces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions—the mining sector is responsible for 4% to 7% of GHG emissions globally. We therefore believe that while increased revenue stemming from growing demand for minerals will most likely create opportunities for mining companies to expand their operations and contribute to the green transition by providing more minerals, companies that will also focus on how they extract and operate to reduce their carbon footprint through the value chain will have the biggest positive climate impact.
Case study: a historical polluter helping combat climate change
Producing GHG emissions is inevitable for most mining companies. But from a climate-oriented investor’s perspective, transparency and having an action plan to control and reduce GHG emissions are the most important things in this carbon-intensive sector. For example, one of our holdings produced more than 4 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (Mt CO2e) in 2020,3 which is the equivalent of about 800,000 gasoline cars driven for a year. There’s no denying—the company has historically been a heavy polluter.
However, by extracting copper, nickel, and cobalt, the company is significantly contributing to the energy transition, and it does so with a carbon intensity 40% lower than the industry average.1 Moreover, the company is one of the first in its industry to publish a report that is aligned with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures on its climate practices (transparency) and set aggressive GHG emissions reduction targets of 30% by 2025 and 50% by 2030 (action plan).
Electrification and efficiency
Producing cleaner energy and extracting more transition materials are critical to the green transition, but are also just one part of the story—how we use them is also key. To make the biggest climate impact, decarbonizing areas of the real economy that are dependent on fossil fuels such as transport and heating should also be prioritized.
Transport and heating account for nearly 25% and 40% of global energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, respectively, which is mainly explained by a low penetration of renewables in these two sectors. To reduce GHG emissions and reach a more sustainable future, these two sectors need significant investment in modernization and retrofitting.
There’s a large difference between the energy mix for electricity versus transport and heating
Share of energy from low-carbon sources (%)
Moving away from fossil fuels in these industries, however, is no easy task, since the infrastructure and the systems built over the past many decades were primarily designed to be powered by fossil fuels. Adapting to and integrating electricity technologies will therefore take time and capital, especially in these two sectors.
Moreover, there are areas where it’s structurally difficult to replace fossil fuels and where technology isn’t there yet. For example, the furnaces producing steel and cement need to operate at extremely high heat—more than 1,000ºC—and such a high temperature is hard to achieve without burning fossil fuels.
Electrification will go as far as technology takes it, and investors can help companies push the boundaries of innovation. We believe companies that have products or services that provide society with more efficient, and less carbon-intensive ways to operate, will continue to see sustainable demand from investors over the long term.
Case study: a new wave of electrification
When we think about electrification, especially in the transport sector, EVs are usually top of mind. But there’s so much more work to be done in this sector. It’s widely acknowledged that to succeed in combating climate change, electrification must spread beyond cars and buses and extend to ships, trains, and long-haul trucks, which pose a bigger challenge than cars and buses, as they carry heavier loads on longer distances.
One of our current portfolio companies has made a step in that direction, developing the necessary technology to electrify ferries. Crossing times of the ferries haven’t changed and it only takes a few minutes to charge them when they reach the shore, but they save about 28,000 tonnes of CO2 per year. Moreover, the company doesn’t build ferries; it provides the battery technology to transform existing diesel ferries into electric-powered ones, thereby limiting its environmental impact.
We’re still far from being able to cross the Atlantic, as the current route for these ferries is only a few kilometers, but the company is an agent of innovation in areas that are critical to the green transition.
While the first three investment pillars—low-carbon energy, transition materials, and electrification and efficiency—mainly aim to reduce long-term global GHG emissions and limit the temperature rise of our planet to less than 2ºC above preindustrial levels, the main goal of the resource security pillar is to help address the consequences of rising temperatures.
From changing weather patterns and rising sea levels to more frequent and intense climate events such as prolonged droughts and torrential floodings, rising temperatures will increasingly challenge our already fragile ecosystem over the next decades. This threat is particularly important for food and water security, as the impacts of climate change are often first felt through water and land. We live in a world with finite resources to feed a growing population with rising standards of living, and we can’t really afford to lose arable lands and drinking water sources due to climate change. But the reality is that it’s a very real possibility.
“… the world will need to increase food production by more than 50 percent to feed nearly 10 billion people adequately in 2050.”
“By 2050, over half of the world’s population and half of global grain production will be exposed to severe water scarcity.”
We believe, however, this is both a challenge and an opportunity: Investors who are mindful of the different forces at play to reach a more sustainable future can help solve these key issues by investing in companies that are contributing to stronger global food and water supply chains.
Case study: look at the bigger picture
A company we consider to be a strong contributor to the green transition is a leader in the manufacturing of agricultural and other equipment. Its flagship products today are largely diesel-fueled, which produce a large amount of GHG emissions when used. Due to this large carbon footprint, the company may not make it through some negative screenings. The company, however, uses a large part of its revenue to invest in precision agriculture and to develop new technologies to lessen both emissions and the need for fertilizers.
By providing farmers with the tools they need to become more efficient in every aspect of their production process, from increasing crop yields to improving water management, this company is helping them feed a growing population and make the most of our world’s finite resources.
Investing effectively to combat climate change
While the green transition is accelerating, we still have a long way to go before reaching net zero, and investors’ capital will certainly be key for companies to continue increasing renewable energy capacity, develop new technologies, and decarbonize their operations. We believe that investors who want to have the biggest impact on climate change shouldn’t limit their investments to only low-emissions companies, but rather companies that help the world reduce its carbon emissions and deal with the cascading effects of climate change.
We believe companies that extract transition materials, play a big role in our evolution to a lower carbon energy mix, are an agent of innovation and electrification, and/or help provide resource security for a growing population should also be considered when building climate-focused portfolios. Ironically, reaching a more sustainable future, in our view, is hardly achievable should investors decide to avoid the problem and filter out heavy polluters altogether from their portfolios, as that is where significant investment is needed to reduce emissions.
For us, being part of the climate change solution and investing effectively in the green transition means applying a thorough security selection process that looks beyond simple environmental metrics such as GHG emissions today and encompasses our four key investment pillars to assess future competitiveness and contribution to the low-carbon transition.
1 Manulife Investment Management, 2022. 2 The company’s 2021 annual report. 3 The company’s 2021 annual report.
The case studies shown here are for illustrative purposes only, do not represent all of the investments made, sold, or recommended for client accounts, and should not be considered an indication of the ESG integration, performance, or characteristics of any current or future Manulife Investment Management product or investment strategy.
Manulife Investment Management conducts hundreds of ESG engagements each year but does not engage on all issues or with all issuers in our portfolios. We also frequently conduct collaborative engagements in which we do not set the terms of engagement but lend our support in order to achieve a desired outcome. Where we own and operate physical assets, we seek to weave sustainability into our operational strategies and execution. The case studies shown are illustrative of different types of engagements across our in-house investment teams, asset classes and geographies in which we operate. While we conduct outcome-based engagements to enhance long term-financial value for our clients, we recognize that our engagements may not necessarily result in outcomes which are significant or quantifiable. In addition, we acknowledge that any observed outcomes may be attributable to factors and influences independent of our engagement activities. Our approach to ESG investing and incorporation of ESG principles into the investment process differs by investment strategy and investment team. It should not be assumed that an investment in the company discussed herein was or will be profitable. Actual investments will vary and there is no guarantee that a particular fund or client account will hold the investments or reflect the characteristics identified herein. Please see our ESG policies for details.
We consider that the integration of sustainability risks in the decision-making process is an important element in determining long-term performance outcomes and is an effective risk mitigation technique. Our approach to sustainability provides a flexible framework that supports implementation across different asset classes and investment teams. While we believe that sustainable investing will lead to better long-term investment outcomes, there is no guarantee that sustainable investing will ensure better returns in the longer term. In particular, by limiting the range of investable assets through the exclusionary framework, positive screening and thematic investment, we may forego the opportunity to invest in an investment which we otherwise believe likely to outperform over time.
Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Financial markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. The information provided does not take into account the suitability, investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific person.
All overviews and commentary are intended to be general in nature and for current interest. While helpful, these overviews are no substitute for professional tax, investment or legal advice. Clients and prospects should seek professional advice for their particular situation. Neither Manulife Investment Management, nor any of its affiliates or representatives (collectively “Manulife Investment Management”) is providing tax, investment or legal advice.
This material is intended for the exclusive use of recipients in jurisdictions who are allowed to receive the material under their applicable law. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and are subject to change without notice. Our investment teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. These opinions may not necessarily reflect the views of Manulife Investment Management. The information and/or analysis contained in this material has been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but Manulife Investment Management does not make any representation as to their accuracy, correctness, usefulness, or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use of the information and/or analysis contained. The information in this material may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets, management discipline, or other expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. The information in this document, including statements concerning financial market trends, are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Manulife Investment Management disclaims any responsibility to update such information.
Manulife Investment Management shall not assume any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or any other consequence of any person acting or not acting in reliance on the information contained here. This material was prepared solely for informational purposes, does not constitute a recommendation, professional advice, an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of Manulife Investment Management to any person to buy or sell any security or adopt any investment approach, and is no indication of trading intent in any fund or account managed by Manulife Investment Management. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Diversification or asset allocation doesn’t guarantee a profit or protect against the risk of loss in any market. Unless otherwise specified, all data is sourced from Manulife Investment Management. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
A widespread health crisis such as a global pandemic could cause substantial market volatility, exchange-trading suspensions and closures, and affect portfolio performance. For example, the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has resulted in significant disruptions to global business activity. The impact of a health crisis and other epidemics and pandemics that may arise in the future, could affect the global economy in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the present time. A health crisis may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social and economic risks. Any such impact could adversely affect the portfolio’s performance, resulting in losses to your investment.
This material has not been reviewed by, and is not registered with, any securities or other regulatory authority, and may, where appropriate, be distributed by Manulife Investment Management and its subsidiaries and affiliates, which includes the John Hancock Investment Management brand.
Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, Stylized M Design, and Manulife Investment Management & Stylized M Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and by its affiliates under license.