Hello and welcome to the Portfolio Intelligence Podcast. I'm your host, John Bryson, head of investment consulting and education savings here at John Hancock Investment Management. Today is April 8th, 2024. And it's also eclipse day here in the U.S. So I have invited the sun and the moon of our investment world to the podcast. We've got Emily Roland and Matt Miskin, our co chief investment strategists here at John Hancock Investment Management, to talk about their views going forward. Matt, Emily, welcome.

Emily Roland:
Thanks for having us.

Matt Miskin:
Yeah. Thanks for having us.

John Bryson:
How about that for, hokey opening with the eclipse? Pretty good.

Emily Roland:
I was just trying to remember if the sun goes in front of the moon, or the moon in front of the sun, but we can figure that out later.

John Bryson:
We'll go talk about that later. We've got all day to figure that one out. Get your eclipse glasses out. Perfect. Hey, Emily. I want to I want to jump right in and talk a little bit about last week. Friday, we saw us nonfarm payrolls numbers that came in very strong. Manufacturing here in the U.S. data is looking pretty good and improving. It's leading many to think that the rate cuts are on hold for a while. What is your take?

Emily Roland:
Yeah, John, big report. Last Friday we saw the jobs openings rise to over 300,000 for March. We watch really closely to see what the revisions are. Those were actually positive for the last two months to the tune of about 22,000. And the job gains were spread across areas like healthcare, government, leisure and hospitality—all seeing pretty significant gains. The unemployment rate falling, the participation rate rising. So it was another in a series of strong economic readings that we saw last week. You mentioned also the ISM manufacturing index rising as well. New orders coming in. That's one of the key leading indicators that we that we watched closely, the highest in about 18 months. So seeing some positive, economic data. The bond market is definitely shifting in terms of the probability that it's placing on a rate cut in June. We're now looking at about two cuts. You'll probably remember that it was as many as six to end, last year. But to us, you know, it looks like the economy's probably too hot for the Fed to start cutting here in June, given the fact that it's taking a while to get back down to the Fed's 2% inflation target, higher commodity prices as of late certainly not helping in that effort, and the labor market remaining pretty tight here.
So, we do think that cuts are going to be pushed off. But our view is that once they do happen, they're probably going to be a lot more significant than the market expects. We have this data in the newly, released version of Market Intelligence that just came out. So please check this out. But that we've looked historically at Fed rate-cutting cycles, and typically the Fed actually cuts by four and a quarter. So that's 17 rate cuts in a typical cutting cycle. So, while we do think, we're in a period of higher for longer, ultimately the cycle will likely play out the way it does traditionally where there is some type of event—liquidity issue, some type of financial accident—and the Fed starts cutting and they do so by a significant amount, which should be a big tailwind from a duration perspective for fixed-income investors. I think the key right now is to be patient, because today, you know, everything looks pretty awesome. And it's pretty tough to see that type of event on the horizon.

John Bryson:
Well, hey, Matt, let's talk about the market impact of this newest information. How are fixed-income and equity markets reacting?

Matt Miskin:
So, equity markets don't seem to mind, at least as of yet. You did see some volatility as part so certain FOMC members are now saying, ‘Why are we even cutting at all?’ And just last week Neel Kashkari actually said that, and we saw some equity volatility. But Powell really hasn't changed his script yet. And I think as long as Powell is giving the market cover, equities are okay with it. The bond market is seeing some mild pressure because Treasury yields have been rising. We still have a quite a bit of income we're going to be receiving over the course of the year. We started the year with about a 4 to 5% yield, depending on, you know, your kind of higher-quality bond implementation.
So, you know, we're going to still see about three quarters of that distributed to us over the course of the year. But, Treasury yields have been marching higher. Usually that is something that then weighs on the economy, and creates almost a feedback loop, which does help bring down inflationary pressures. But for now, I think there's a bit of a honeymoon phase for equities that are saying, ‘We're okay with this because the data is so strong.’ We also have earnings season coming up.

So, we're going to have to see if equities can roll through that with, you know, this kind of tailwind. But in terms of bonds, you know, again, as Emily was saying, you know, you’ve got to be patient. We're getting paid to wait. Last year, the 10-year started … 10-year Treasury yields started at 3.88%. It ended at 3.88%, but it went as low as 3.3 and as high as 5.
We very well could be in another year where we're bouncing around with Treasury yields. But may not go as far as, you know, the market thinks. We might end up back where we started. And we want to just be patient there. For equities, we don't want to chase here. We want to make sure we're finding good quality companies, having some value exposure, and we think that's the best way to kind of ride out this near-term volatility.

John Bryson:
That's very good. You both said patience is warranted. Hey, Emily, I want to go back to you. We talked a little bit about manufacturing. Globally, it's also improving. How are you feeling about international opportunities right now?

Emily Roland
Yeah. So, we are maintaining, John, a still a modest underweight to international equities. We still have them in our in our overall portfolio views. But we think it's really important to be active in the space. In fact, we do have a preference for international value stocks over international growth. And a key reason for that is that we're always following the earnings. Matt referenced earnings season coming up. You know, we think it's really important to kind of look at international equities in particular through the lens of the fundamentals. Where can we find the best earnings growth? Where are the best opportunities going to be for an active manager in an environment where earnings growth internationally is .. is pretty modest or, you know—to use a technical term—a little blah overseas, while it's more robust here in the U.S.
So when we look at things from a style basis, the earnings trends are simply better on the value side. You know, you think about growth versus value stocks. If you own growth stocks, you want their earnings to grow, which is exactly what they're doing here in the United States. But there's a notable dynamic playing out abroad, where actually international value earnings are growing faster over the last couple of years than international growth earnings. Some of that is due to Japan, which dominates value indices. But overall, that's where we would be tilting portfolios within international indices. We also have a preference for non-U.S. developed markets versus emerging-market equities, given some of the structural challenges we're seeing in EM across China. Some major issues with their property sector. They're moving away from capitalism. There are some longer-term demographic challenges there. So looking to international developed is really the best opportunity across those markets.
John Bryson:
Okay, Emily, a clarification on technical terms. Is meh better than blah, or is blah better than meh?
Emily Roland:
I would go interchangeably on those two.

John Bryson:
Okay. All right. Good to know. Just wanted to clarify. Thank you. Hey, Matt, you mentioned earnings season is coming up right around the corner—starts on Friday. So what are your expectations?
Matt Miskin:
Yeah. So right now, the bar isn't too high. So the analyst community for the S&P 500 is estimating about 3% earnings growth for Q1. And that seems about right to us. It's from there that it gets more interesting. So the street analyst community S&P 500 earnings estimates is that they keep ratcheting up every single quarter and then go almost as high as 20% by year end.
That to us seems less realistic. You know, right now, what we're seeing is this margin compression backdrop where revenues are now growing at about 2 to 3%, which isn't that bad, frankly. And it's about right. But costs for companies are going up a similar amount. Earnings on a last-12-month basis are basically the same they were 2 to 3 years ago. Prices are certainly higher. So that means that the multiple—the valuation—of the market has kept going up. And it is the highest it's been for the last couple of years.
And so, you know, for us it's about finding those profitable companies, those ones with the best margins out there as a part of our quality view. And then we want to have it at a reasonable price, because everything has just gotten more expensive over the last 6 to 12 months. So, our mantra right now is quality a reasonable price, barbelling the quality factor with profitability, with the value factor. And to us, that's managing both the quality risk—or solvency risk or lower quality risk—and the valuation risk in the markets today. But you know, we're going to start with financials here as early as Friday. And the banks and then, you know, we've got some of the bigger market cap companies coming in the weeks ahead.

John Bryson:
Very good. Hey, Emily, back to you. You mentioned that you and Matt had just finished up the first-quarter Market intelligence. And I think you're delivering that tomorrow, and it will be recorded and posted on our website. Are there any opportunities that you're seeing that we haven't discussed on the podcast?

Emily Roland:
Yeah. So, Matt talked about quality at a reasonable price, which continues to be a key theme for us in terms of opportunities. On the equity side, I would say another one that we're continuing to have a lot of conviction is U.S. mid-cap equities—especially since we are seeing this reacceleration in inflation, reacceleration in economic growth. Again, it may be choppy here, as Matt mentioned about bond yields. You know, we can we continue to see this kind of late-cycle chop in the economic data. But we are right now seeing that seeing again a kind of a growth impulse around the world. And we think that's really, mid-cap equities in the U.S. are a great way to play that.
A lot of it is a result of stimulus. We are still employing stimulus, to the tune of almost $2 trillion in deficit spending. And a lot of that's being funneled into industrial production in the United States. It's being supported by things like the CHIPS Act and the Infrastructure and Jobs Act. We've both spent a lot of time in the Midwest over the last quarter, and it is absolutely booming there. You're seeing a manufacturing renaissance, playing out through things like EV production and semiconductor facilities, battery production. It's also been helped by onshoring, so supply chains coming back from China and other parts of the world to the United States. That was a trend that was in play prior to the pandemic. But that's really been accelerated since then.
So, we look at the mid-cap space as having an overweight to the industrials sector. So, these are companies that really are a play on this onshoring and manufacturing renaissance that we're seeing. Mid caps also are a bit more cyclical than some of the areas that we are also focused on, like U.S. large-cap, high-quality tech companies. So, it's a great way to take advantage of a part of the market that's a little bit more cyclical and also on sale. The valuations are quite compelling there as well, especially on the mid-cap value side, to complement that quality exposure that Matt talked about.

John Bryson:
That’s exciting to hear that the opportunities in mid caps in the growth in the Midwest are both really good for America. And Matt, speaking of America, we are in an election year. Are there any research or insights that you come across that you'd want to show that listeners?

Matt Miskin:
You know, we just are looking at, under the Biden administration, what the best-performing parts of the markets have been. And it is very counterintuitive to what you would have thought. So under the Biden administration, the number one performing sector has been energy stocks. And I'm talking traditional fossil fuel, drill-baby-drill, Texas oil companies. So, not alternative energy, which, you know, really, there's been more of an environmentally, a kind of alternative energy push under the Biden administration. Those stocks haven't done well. We are producing more oil than we ever have in this country's history. Other sectors that have done well under the Biden administration: financials, industrials, mid caps, mid-cap value. And under the Trump administration, if you were to look back under that playbook, it was tech, it was growth, it was Chinese stocks. So we have this in Market Intelligence.

To us, it is speaking to the lack of connection between policy—or rhetoric—and market performance. That's why we do not use politics in portfolios. In fact, it's often giving you the exact opposite results as you would have thought. The hardworking families of America are what drive the economy. Corporate profits drive markets. And often the starting valuations matter the most, too.
I mean, under the Biden administration, coming in after energy prices have been taken down so much because of Covid, that was a starting point. There was a lot of deep value available at that starting point, and now it's come back. So again, we're doing a lot more of the work of what's driving the economy, what's driving the markets. It's earnings. It's corporations. It's the jobs market. And, politics, I'm sure it’s going to be a big, you know, reason for a lot of ink to be spilled and a lot of media and links to be clicked. But we're trying to mitigate that as much as possible and focus on the fundamentals.

John Bryson:
Really helpful. We spent a lot of time talking about separating the good information from the noise, and you continue to bring us back to the good information. Folks. Matt and Emily can do the work for you. They're always keeping an eye on the market. You can follow them on LinkedIn. You can go to our website and get their most recent research.
Like I said, the Market Intelligence update, it will be up there soon. Matt. Emily, thanks so much for joining us. I want to wish you a happy eclipse day. Be careful. Wear sunglasses and it's done. You got it. and for those that are listening to the podcast or want to subscribe, please follow us on iTunes or visit our website, jhnvestments.com. You can catch up on all the different things that Matt and Emily are talking about, and all the different business-building ideas we have to offer. Thanks so much for listening.

Important disclosure:
This podcast is being brought to you by John Hancock Investment Management Distributors, LLC, member FINRA, SIPC. The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the speaker, are subject to change as market and other conditions warrant, and do not constitute investment advice or a recommendation regarding any specific product or security. There is no guarantee that any investment strategy discussed will be successful or achieve any particular level of results. Any economic or market performance information is historical and is not indicative of future results, and no forecasts are guaranteed. Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal.

John Bryson:
Hello and welcome to the Portfolio Intelligence Podcast. I'm your host, John Bryson, Head of Investment Consulting and Education Savings here at John Hancock Investment Management. Today is March 21, 2024. Stocks are off to a good start this year; bonds are a bit more of a mixed bag. Today starts March Madness for basketball and, soon, hockey. So I've invited Michael Scanlon of Manulife Investment Management to the podcast. Michael runs balanced portfolios for Manulife. He went to Boston University and teaches in their MBA program. Michael, welcome to the call.

Michael Scanlon:
Morning, John. Thanks for having me. I'm looking forward to a good chat here.

John Bryson:
You got it. So, a lot of people are talking about their brackets today, their men's basketball brackets. But you're a hockey fan. You went to BU, you teach there. I think you're more focused on hockey. What do you ... what do you think about the hockey tournament this year?

Michael Scanlon:
Well, it's I guess it's pretty predictable where I'm heading with this, but we're coming up on the pros and … I’m feeling pretty good about BU heading into that part of the season.

John Bryson:
Fair enough. As a Boston College grad, I'm going to put my money on them hypothetically anyway. And since this is recorded, one of us will want to hear this podcast in the near future. All right. Perfect. Hey, listen, broadly speaking, 2023 turned out to be a very good year for balanced portfolios. To what extent do you think that's put to bed the narrative that the 60/40 portfolio was dead?

Michael Scanlon:
Yeah. So obviously, you know, a couple of years ago, we were in a lot different interest-rate environment, right. And I can't tell you how many people forwarded me those … those news articles that were writeups in the Wall Street Journal or whatever, talking about how the 60/40 was dead. And, you know, I think that lasted for about six months.

So, you know, I think there was obviously some just recency bias around where we were from an interest-rate perspective and those kind of things. But, you know, the world has changed pretty materially. And, you know, nowadays I think you look at it, I mean, if you look at stocks, right to the economy in the economic data kind of flatlines here.

You know, that's the kind of environment that you would think stocks would do pretty well in. If things do get worse and the Fed cuts rates, or the market starts to discount future cuts by the Fed, you know, fixed income has the opportunity to do pretty well. And, you know, in this environment, that flexibility to be able to allocate back and forth and actively manage portfolios on either side of it, you know, that's a pretty attractive solution for what we're seeing out there today.

John Bryson:
That's great to hear. And I think that's continued into this year also. So you mentioned opportunities. Let's talk about opportunities. Where are you seeing the best opportunities globally? Let's focus on equities and what gets you excited about those opportunities.

Michael Scanlon:
Sure. So, at a very high level, we've obviously had very dramatic outperformance in the U.S. versus the rest of the world over, really, the last 13 or 14 years. I don't see anything telling me that we're on the cusp of that ending for a number of secular reasons, right? Whether it's the U.S. having very strong demographics relative to the rest of the world being the innovation economy, a number of other factors.

But I think the … the opportunity set out there continues to skew domestically. And I think that despite the dramatic outperformance going forward, I think that it's the best opportunity set continuing. If I take it one step lower, I think the greatest opportunity in the equity markets today is just picking stocks, right? I mean, if you look out there at the universe, I think this idea of just riding the beta wave that worked so effectively after the financial crisis through, say, roughly 2019. I think that's over.

You know, we kind of hit an inflection point around 2019 where stock picking started to matter a lot more. And I think that that's going to be the biggest driver going forward. So I think if, you know, a lot of people like to talk about chasing factors or that kind of stuff, I don't see that as adding any value. I think you just want to have a portfolio of individual stocks rather than chasing factor bets.

John Bryson:
And it's interesting you say that the active over passive, we're seeing that inflow right now. So I wonder if we're at the cusp of more and more people getting on board with that. And that's—

Michael Scanlon:
Interesting. If you look at it. I mean, the last handful of years, which has been, you know, that period after the financial crisis was a pretty challenging environment for active management, right. So what is ... what was the reaction to it? A lot of active managers started to hold a heck of a lot more stocks and dilute down their active share than they had historically. And now we've hit that inflection point where stock picking and actively managing the portfolio matters a lot more. So now you have people—kind of—that need to react to that and chase back to the active management.

John Bryson:
Yeah, that totally makes sense. All right. So let's dig in a little bit deeper on equities. What themes you focused on and most excited about.

Michael Scanlon:
Yeah, So I think there's great opportunity right now in individual stocks. And then, you know, outside of that, there are some more broad themes that I think are pretty attractive, right? I mean, if you think about the the opportunity for advertising dollars to continue to shift from traditional vehicles such as linear television, print media, those things to online, I think digital advertising is really poised to do well, especially if we do have, you know, at some point, the most anticipated recession in history, and that, you know, direct response, digital advertising will be the last thing cut.
Right? Because if you're an advertiser and you buy, say, an ad in a big game for a sporting event or something like that, you don't really have the ability to measure the return. So that's the kind of stuff that gets cut quickly. Whereas if you have, you know, click here on this link to buy something, you can measure the return on those advertising dollars very quickly.
So, as you've seen, you know, bigger companies that have been around that weathered a couple of recessions in their lifecycle at this point, that tends to be a pretty good place because those, again, will be the last advertising dollars cut. And then on the commodity side of things, you know, I do think that the energy offer opportunities are pretty robust out there.

And in addition to that, I also think something like copper, as we think about the transition to the electrification of everything, you know, there is no transition to the electrification of everything without copper. And so I think that, you know, some companies that are poised to benefit from stronger price appreciation in the copper market are great investments as well.

John Bryson:
Very good. One more equity theme I want to ask you about. You know, there's a lot of talk on weight-loss drugs there in the news that that's the next big drug and a lot of uptake. What what's your take on it and what else is on your radar, and healthcare?

Michael Scanlon:
Yeah. So on the GLP-1 category of drugs, I think there's obviously ... I don't know if hysteria is the right adjective to put on it, but we're in a pretty unique time with it. And you're certainly ... there's a lot of excitement about the drug class. What I would tell you is I think some of it might be a little bit overdone.

Like you look at companies that are, you know, carbonated-beverage companies are kind of traditional, middle-of-the-grocery-store type companies that have been under a lot of pressure with this thesis that, you know, everybody's going to be on these GLP-1s and never buy, you know, high-sugar food or that kind of stuff. I think some of that … that reaction has been overdone, especially at the company-specific level.

But longer term, it's it's incredibly attractive, right? And you know, we do have ... there's a number of companies that you can get exposure to the group in. But another place that I would also say that's been overdone is there's a lot of negative rhetoric around this idea of, well, people are never going to need hip replacements or knee replacements anymore because all of a sudden everybody's going to be so much lighter and not carrying
around weight.

The problem with that thesis is that if you look at the traditional drivers of that, it's more active lifestyles. So if you're somebody that is going to be in better shape because you're not going to be carrying around all that extra weight, you're going to probably have a more active lifestyle, which means, you know, unfortunately, at some point you're probably going to need a new hip, knee, shoulder, whatever it might be.

So it's opened up a bunch of different opportunities as we're kind of in the stage of hysteria today. And keep in mind that there is another leg to this, right, that you know, right now, these are drugs that have to be cold, chain delivered, right? It has to be maintained in a low temperature and delivered to the ultimate customer.

But there are a number of drugs in development on that side which are in pill form. And that makes it much easier in terms of a deliverable. So there's still a lot of opportunity there going forward.

John Bryson:
That’s a really interesting take on ... on that asset class and that's awesome. We mentioned earlier you run a balanced fund. You talked about liking the flexibility to move assets back and forth between equities and fixed income. What's your take on the Fed right now and how is that shaping your current approach?

Michael Scanlon:
Yeah. So on the fixed-income side, I mean, I think it's … you're in this part of the cycle right now where you've got diverging global central bank policies, right? And my opinion would be that I don't foresee the Fed doing anything this year. I think they're just going to sit on their hands and ride it out. I think everyday that ticks by makes it more and more difficult for them to actually make a move just because people get more and more concerned that the Fed, which is supposed to be an apolitical body, is now influencing the election in one direction or the other.

So I think as we get closer to that election date, it's less and less likely that they actually do anything. And right now, the data is telling you that they're not going to do anything. And it's remarkable, right? You think back to November of last year, I think there were eight cuts priced into the market, 100% chance of a cut in the March meeting.

And now we're down to a little over two cuts priced into the market. And obviously, we just passed the March meeting where they did not do anything. So, you know, I think my former partner on the strategy used to have a saying that if you get consensus numbers and a consensus thesis, that's a recipe for a short career.

I think anybody that's been following the Fed and just kind of saying, you know, the Fed's going to do what's priced into the market, there's been a pretty painful wakeup call. And, you know, if I flip things around and ... apologies for a long answer here, I think a lot of people are saying that, you know, when the Fed cuts, that's just automatically going to be great for equities.

I would be really, really, really cautious with that view. right? You've got to be careful what you wish for, because I would say right now, when you look at earnings, or when I talk to company management teams, I'm not seeing or hearing anything that's telling me that the Fed needs to be cutting rates, right? I mean, we've got 3.5% unemployment, just under 4% inflation, and the equity markets at roughly an all-time high.

That's, you know, the exact inverse of when the Fed typically cuts rates. So if the Fed did cut rates, somebody like me is going to take a step back and say, you know, my God, what is the Fed seeing that's about to steamroll me that I'm not seeing or hearing? And my only reaction should be, well, maybe I should start to de-risk things to get in front of whatever the Fed is seeing.

John Bryson:
But it's not a long answer. A great answer. Thank you, Mike. One last thing I want to dig in on. You mentioned it's an election year and that would probably put the Fed on pause as we get closer and closer. As an investor, how do you think about politics in an election year?

Michael Scanlon:
I have never heard anyone in my career or lifetime, actually, of being able to describe how you accurately position a portfolio for the outcome of some sort of election cycle. I don't know how you do it. Obviously, when you think about the companies that you own and the trends that they're ... they have tailwinds from, you know, there are certainly political influences there.

But, I mean, if you think about it, the U.S. has never been more divided politically than we have been for, say, you know, the last 10 years or so. The roots of that run pretty deep. And yet, you know, with both parties having been in power in the last 10 years and, you know, this divisive rhetoric, you know, the equity markets and has still done pretty well.

So I don't know how you position a portfolio for the outcome of an election cycle, certainly we're politically aware, but I would not say that that's the overwhelming driver in terms of how you manage a strategy, because it's really, really difficult to predict that outcome. And as we all know, the polling data has been horrific the last handful of election cycles.

John Bryson:
Yeah, great, great info on that one, Mike. But we get that question a lot from investors and advisors and we try to tell people, you know, that's more market noise than anything else, so try to not payas close attention. It sounds like you're taking that same approach. So great insights.

Michael Scalon:
Yeah. Well, Michael Gerson, years ago, that said, you know, the world can only end once and this doesn't feel like that time. I think, you know, a lot of people would tell you, if Biden gets elected, people are telling you the world is going to end. And, you know, on the flip side, some people are telling you if Trump gets elected, the world is going to end.
What I would say is I think the world is going to be okay the next day and we'll figure it out.

John Bryson:
Yeah. Now, fair enough. Fair enough. The world only ends when the be your BU Terriers lose to the Boston College Eagles at some point later this season. Sorry. Quick side note, folks, I want to first thank Michael for being on the podcast. Great discussion today. Thanks, great catching up with you folks. If you want to hear more, please subscribe to the Portfolio Intelligence Podcast on on iTunes or you can find it on our website.
JH Investments dot com. You can also find tons of great viewpoints on all things investing and practice management there, so please check it out. As always. Thanks for listening to the show.

Important disclosure:
This podcast is being brought to you by John Hancock Investment Management Distributors, LLC, member FINRA, SIPC. The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the speaker, are subject to change as market and other conditions warrant, and do not constitute investment advice or a recommendation regarding any specific product or security. There is no guarantee that any investment strategy discussed will be successful or achieve any particular level of results. Any economic or market performance information is historical and is not indicative of future results, and no forecasts are guaranteed. Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal.